2 Kinds of Cool
by Brian Berard LEED AP
Philip H. DeBels P.E., CSBA, LEED AP
Tara L. Frentrop P.E., LEED AP
Clara Simon LEED AP
June 1, 2009
The
University of Washington is managing 21 LEED® projects at the
moment, but few UW facilities are more interdisciplinary than
90-year-old Savery Hall. Therefore, it was only appropriate that a
mixed-mode strategy including VRF and natural ventilation should
combine the new and the old to deliver a lesson in performance.
The University of Washington
is managing 21 LEED® projects at the moment, but few UW
facilities are more interdisciplinary than 90-year-old Savery Hall.
Therefore, it was only appropriate that a mixed-mode strategy
including VRF and natural ventilation should combine the new and the
old to deliver a lesson in performance.
The
University of Washington (UW) is primarily located on three campuses
in Seattle, Tacoma, and Bothell, WA, with research and educational
facilities throughout the world.
In 2004, the UW
established a plan titled, “Restoring The Core,” to renew and
renovate 15 significant buildings on the Seattle campus. The plan
identified the deteriorating conditions of these buildings — which
total more than 900,000 gross sq ft and house more than 40 academic
programs — as a threat to UW’s ability to deliver core campus
functions in teaching, research, and public service. The goals were
to overcome the threat, and to protect and sustain the university’s
mission. Savery Hall, a “Restore The Core” building combines a
traditionally historical ventilation system with newer sustainable
heating and cooling technology.
The Savery Hall
renovation received funding from the Washington State Legislature
provided that it achieves at least a LEED®-NC Silver rating through
the USGBC. In addition to sustainable considerations, seismic and ADA
upgrades were also identified in the plan for this project. Upon
completion, the operating data for electricity, gas, water, and steam
consumption will be reported to the state through 2016, which
creates transparency in design, construction, and operation results.
UW is managing this renovation through its
Capital Projects Office (CPO), whose management plan is a
collaborative process that includes a building committee; input from
the departments of engineering, facilities, and environmental safety;
and an internal approval process through the Architectural Commission
and the Board of Regents. The CPO works through an integrated design
process on each project and hires the required architects and
consultants, a commissioning authority, and a contractor through a
GC/CM process. The CPO constantly seeks innovative ways to guide
design teams through the UW process and to streamline efficiencies
that will pay off during building operation.
 |
| An artist’s rendering of the second floor mezzanine offices. Image courtesy of SRG Partnership, Inc. |
|
Savery
Hall continues UW’s legacy of green building excellence. For the
third year in a row, the UW has received a grade of “A” in the
“Green Building” and an “A-” overall on the College
Sustainability Report Card issued by the Sustainability Endowments
Institute. Of the 300 colleges surveyed, the report card identified
UW as one of the 16 overall sustainability leaders. “The UW is
committed to be all it can to minimize our impact on the
environment,” said Mark Emmert, UW president. “This grade of A-
reflects the work of countless people who have found innovative ways
to make the University more sustainable. There is still a great deal
more to do, and we continue to work hard at it every day.”
Keeping in line with the UW’s sustainability
goals, Savery Hall is one of 21 LEED projects in progress. A top
priority for each of these projects is lowering the cost of operation
through the reduction of energy usage. To that end, Savery Hall, is
a LEED-NC v2.1 major renovation. In order to achieve the LEED-NC
Silver objective, a primary goal was to design a building
heating/cooling system that could augment a naturally ventilated
building. A variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system was selected to
meet this goal.
Savery Hall
Savery
Hall was designed by Bebb & Gould in the Collegiate Gothic style
and built in two phases, in 1917 and 1920. It houses the College of
Arts and Sciences’ Department of Economics, Department of
Philosophy, and Department of Sociology. Savery Hall also provides
space for the Center of Social Science Computation and Research
(CSSCR), a computer resource center that provides facilities and
support for all the social sciences. The building serves as a major
instructional facility, with over 25% of the assignable area in
classroom use. UW has committed to preserving this historically
significant building and extending its useful life. A collective
effort involving UW Capital Projects, design professionals,
occupants, and contractors was required. SRG Partnership of Seattle
was selected to direct the team and provide architectural
renovations.1
Mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing systems in the building were operating well;
however they had exceeded their service life, did not satisfy current
demand or current codes, and were inefficient. The 85-year-old
building was in need of complete renovation.
In
an effort to continue the sustainable and energy-saving goals of the
university and to meet state-mandated requirements, the team
originally set out to meet LEED-NC Silver rating requirements. The
team has exceeded this goal and is on track for a LEED-NC Gold
Certification. To improve its performance and energy efficiency, the
project replaced all major building systems, including mechanical and
electrical systems. It also replaces the telecommunications and
interior finish systems to meet modern classroom and academic program
needs.
During the pre-design and schematic design
phases, to comply with the university’s design criteria and to
reduce energy consumption, a traditional variable air volume (VAV)
system (without mechanical cooling) was proposed. To improve the
building’s sustainability and further reduce energy consumption, a
natural ventilation system was investigated and modeled. This
modeling led the team to a VRF system and finally a mixed mode
natural ventilation and VRF system.
PRE-DESIGN, SCHEMATIC design, and UW CRITERIA
|
|
| FIGURE 1. Overview of the proposed VRF and heat recovery ventilation system. |
|
Over
the past several years, UW developed a “Facility Design Guide”
which provides continuity and consistency to the mechanical systems
it builds and maintains. As a general practice, mechanical cooling is
not provided in general-use buildings, except for libraries and large
auditoriums. For buildings without mechanical cooling, outdoor air is
used for free cooling, and the amount of outdoor air provided is that
which will limit the indoor temperature rise to 7°. The outdoor
summer design temperature for Seattle is 82°F, consequently, on a
summer design day, the heating and ventilating system (HV) should
maintain conditioned spaces at or below 89°. Building
heat gains are typically generated by people, lights, equipment, and
solar gain through the windows. These loads are computed and used to
calculate a summer design day supply air quantity. Since this amount
of supply air is only required when climatic conditions are at or
exceed a summer design day, a traditional VAV system was proposed at
the pre-design phase to reduce fan energy and heating energy. This
proposal was further developed during the schematic design phase. In
practice, to the benefit of the occupants, most general buildings
following this design approach do not exceed 80° to 85°, because
the actual heat gains are usually less than peak design values.
UW is dedicated to implementing sustainable
design practices, reducing energy use, and reducing its carbon
footprint. After reviewing the Savery Hall project, UW’s design
team decided to break from tradition and investigate more efficient,
more sustainable HVAC systems. At the outset of the design
development phase, the design team was asked to analyze a natural
ventilation approach for Savery Hall based upon several similar
operating facilities. Vision Engineering, located in Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada, was selected to model a natural ventilation
approach because of its experience and efforts in working with the
university on other similar projects.
Natural Ventilation
Natural
ventilation is the use of a building’s shape and orientation,
coupled with wind and warm air buoyancy, to induce airflow through a
building. This natural airflow ventilates and cools the building. Air
is typically introduced at the windows and exits the building at a
high point. Using the following design and
operating parameters, the natural ventilation approach was modeled to
determine its ability to ventilate and cool Savery
Hall: Trickle
vents. Located under every window that opens into an
occupied space with vent length matching the existing window width
(approximately 40 in. wide by 8.6 in. high). Each vent had 40% free
area, which provided 50 cfm per vent, satisfying the minimum
ventilation requirements. Three
wind towers. Each wind tower was equipped with an
exhaust fan, which was to be activated in response to CO 2
sensors. Classroom
occupancy/lighting/equipment schedules. The
occupancy (50 people/sq ft) varied from 0% to 90% depending upon time
of day. The lighting (0.8 W/sq ft) varied from 5% to 90% and the
equipment (2 W/sq ft) varied from 5% to 90%. Office
occupancy/lighting/equipment schedules. The
occupancy (7 people/sq ft) varied from 0% to 90% depending upon time
of day. The lighting (0.8 W/sq ft) varied from 5% to 90%, and the
equipment (1 W/sq ft) varied from 5% to 90%. Glazing.
Double, low E, Solarban 80 with aluminum frame (U= 0.329, SC =
0.43). The following design and operating
parameters could not be fully modeled, but were factored into the
conclusions:
- A night purge
routine using wind tower fans.
- Turning
lights off during the hottest part of the day.
- DDC routines which allow cooling to concentrate on the hottest
rooms.
- Occupant diversity.
-
Manually operated windows.
- Internal mass
of objects within the building (desks, chairs, books,
etc).2
The
building’s mass was effectively used to shed load; however it could
not be maximized with the used of shading devices due to the
historical nature of the building. The natural ventilation modeling
report concluded that adequate ventilation could be provided, except
for the fourth floor, which had no windows. This study also concluded
that supplemental cooling was required for 43 rooms and may be
required for an additional 84 rooms.
VRF
After
the completion of the natural ventilation analysis, it was evident
that the building could not be adequately cooled utilizing natural
ventilation. An alternative cooling system had to be selected. A VRF
system was chosen for this building because of its high efficiencies,
system flexibility, and minimal space requirements, which worked well
in preserving the historic nature of the building.
|
|
| FIGURE 2. An energy use comparison between VAV vs. VRF. The VRF system reduced energy consumption by 27.5%. |
|
VRF
is a simultaneous heating and cooling, multi-zone system that
retrieves energy from one zone to provide thermal comfort to another
zone. A typical VRF system consists of an outdoor condensing unit,
circuit controllers, and various indoor units. Refrigerant piping
connects each of these components providing a means of energy
transfer between the zones. At Savery Hall,
floor-standing indoor VRF units were used to serve the mezzanine
office spaces, which did not have enough ceiling space to house
concealed ceiling units. Due to these space constraints, natural
ventilation was used to ventilate the mezzanine offices. All other
office spaces, as well as the conference rooms and classrooms,
utilized ceiling concealed units, which are dependent upon more
traditional distribution systems. Each of the ceiling-concealed VRF
units were provided with direct-ducted outside air. This air was
supplied by a 100% outside air, central AHU with heat recovery
capabilities and was sized for economizer capacity.
Seattle Energy Code
The 2006 Seattle Energy Code allows an HVAC system to be installed without economizers if the equipment’s efficiencies are at least 15% higher than the minimum values listed in the Code’s tables of minimum efficiency requirements. These values are based upon the American Refrigeration Institute (ARI) standard for equipment testing. Unfortunately, VRF equipment did not have an applicable ARI Standard at the time the permit was submitted for this project. Since the very nature of VRF systems make them less efficient with the use of economizers because of the inability to transfer energy between zones, an alternate method had to be employed in order to receive an economizer exception.
|
|
| FIGURE 3. The final mixed mode solution: Ceiling-mounted VRF units in classrooms and offices. Floor-mounted VRF units are in the mezzanine offices.
|
|
The design team was tasked with performing an assessment using “RS-29 Nonresidential Building Design” by System Analysis, which ultimately states that a “proposed building shall provide equal or better conservation of energy than the standard design.” 3 An additional document, the Seattle Department of Planning’s Director’s Rule DR 27-2005, outlines the procedural requirements for systems analysis and defines standard assumptions for both buildings. In this particular model, which was completed using EnergySoft’s EnergyPro software, all factors were held constant with the exception of the HVAC system type in order to obtain an accurate sense of the savings from this system alone. The baseline building was modeled with a traditional VAV system with an outside air economizer, and the proposed building was modeled with a VRF system. (Figure 1) This analysis showed that the use of the proposed VRF system without an economizer would result in a 27.5% energy savings compared to the baseline code minimum VAV system (Figure 2). This energy savings allowed the project to qualify for the energy code economizer exemption and helped the project realize substantial first-cost savings by reducing the size of the central air handler to a capacity consistent with minimum outside air requirements. Additional energy savings were accomplished by reducing the size of all ductwork and simplifying the control system.
Mixed-Mode Solution
In
addition to the first-cost savings from the economizer exemption, the
design team realized that additional energy savings could be achieved
by also including some of the earlier project natural ventilation
strategies. The final HVAC system design for Savery Hall ended up
using a mixed-mode approach, employing both VRF and natural
ventilation (Figure 3).
The VRF system is
installed throughout the building, and all perimeter spaces are
equipped with operable windows. There are three wind towers located
in the building to allow for the natural ventilation process. Each of
the wind towers has an associated exhaust fan that allows for fan
assist of the natural ventilation system if any of the centrally
located CO2 sensors alarm.
When outdoor conditions are optimal for natural ventilation and the
indoor space temperature is within an acceptable range (68° to 82°),
the indoor VRF units serving the perimeter spaces are turned off by
the building’s EMS. In conjunction with the unit turning off, a
green light is turned on in the occupant’s space, signaling them
that they should use their operable window in order to control their
thermal comfort.
During these optimal conditions,
the indoor VRF units are switched into a fan-only mode to allow for
mechanical ventilation but to prohibit any heating or cooling in the
space. When indoor space conditions are no longer within an
acceptable range, the VRF unit is turned back on by the EMS, and a
red light is turned on in the space to alert the occupant that the
VRF system is on signaling that the windows should be closed to
conserve energy.
Training the occupants on the
system and informing them of how their actions affect the overall
energy use of the building is a key with this integrated system type.
UW is employing several technologies in order to keep their occupants
informed of the building’s status and their ongoing role in its
success. ES
Works Cited
1.
Background and historical information provided by the project
architect, SRG Partnership, Inc. Special thanks to the following:
Rick Zieve, FAIA, design principal; Gary Harris, AIA, project
manager; and Aaron Pleskac, AIA, project architect.
2.
Design Development Stage Natural Ventilation Modeling Results
for the University of Washington at Seattle, Washington, Prepared by
Vision Engineering: Albert Bicol, P.E. LEED® AP, partner.
3.
Seattle Energy Code RS-29b
|