This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
A recent article1, ASHRAE guidelines, and the position of many health authorities point to the reality of the dangers inherent in systems populated with Legionella species. However, therein and in other publications, we find the mantra “The mere presence of Legionella . . . will not in itself cause illness. High numbers of Legionella have been noted in cooling towers and other sources with no associated disease” that serves to lessen the impact of the reality. This untenable position is also held by some water treatment firms, some at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and a few world health authorities (albeit not all). If numbers imply nothing, why test?
To everyone with a similar view, I pose the question: “If someone were to add live vibrio cholera to a 1,000-gal container at an inoculum <1 colony forming unit per million (cfu/ml), would that person take a drink of water from that tank?”