This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
ES Magazine logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
ES Magazine logo
  • Home
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Ad Index
  • Products
  • News
  • Sectors
    • Colleges/ Universities
    • Commercial
    • Government/ Institutional
    • Health Care
    • Hospitality
    • K-12
    • Mission Critical
  • Topics
    • Building Automation
    • Cooling & Chillers
    • Design/ Construction Process
    • Heating & Boilers
    • IAQ
    • Life Safety
    • Motors & Drives
    • Pumps & Flow Controls
    • Retrofits
    • Ventilation
  • Columns
    • Back2Basics
    • Building Automation Column
    • Case In Point
    • Commissioning
    • Editor's Note
    • Facility Files
    • IAQ: A Physician's View
    • Tomorrow's Environment
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • Video Spotlights
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Sneak Peek Spotlight
    • White Paper eBlast
    • Case Study eBlasts
  • Resources
    • eNewsletters
    • Continuing Education
    • White Papers
    • Industry Events
    • ES Store
    • Classifieds
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Market Research
  • Today's Boiler
    • Today’s Boiler Digital Edition
  • Directory
    • SourceBook
    • Take a Tour
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
Home » Commissioning: Definitions and Duties
Columns

Commissioning: Definitions and Duties

February 28, 2002
Rebecca T. Ellis, P.E.
Reprints
No Comments
My December 1999 "Getting it Right" column explored the differences between commissioning and quality control. In summary, I suggested that quality control is about confirming static equipment and component installation and commissioning is about confirming dynamic system performance and preparing operations and maintenance (O&M) staff to operate those systems. With two more years of commissioning experience behind us, it seems imperative to revisit the relationship between quality control and commissioning.

The Commissioning Process

Commissioning is a process intended to supplement "normal" project delivery processes and, for the most part, is not intended to duplicate successful efforts being provided in other aspects of a normal program. As such, the success of commissioning is dependent on the proper execution of all normal project delivery tasks such as design engineering, team communication, construction scheduling, equipment installation and startup, testing and balancing, and, of course, quality control. These are all prerequisites to one of the key milestones in the commissioning process: functional performance testing.

If any team member fails in his responsibilities, it could very well result in a failure of the system to perform as intended, and this will become apparent during functional testing. For example, if a space temperature sensor is not terminated at the appropriate control panel, its associated variable-air volume unit will not respond to changes in space temperature. Similarly, if the test and balance contractor doesn't adjust exhaust fan speed to achieve design airflows to all spaces served, some individual space pressure controls will be unable to achieve their setpoints.

Don't Pass The Buck

In theory, the approach of first completing all normal quality control checks and then proceeding into functional testing is quite logical. I've always viewed the functional testing process as an opportunity for the installation contractors to "show off" their good work and receive credit for it. However, as time goes on and some contractors (particularly in a low-bid environment) learn about how commissioning is performed, they are using commissioning as an excuse to lighten up on their quality control responsibilities. The feedback I have heard goes something like this, "If commissioning is going to test everything at the end, why should I bother checking things out ahead of time? Let the commissioning process find my mistakes, and then I'll fix them."

I was shocked and demoralized to hear this attitude in more than one instance, as it seemed to represent the opposite effect on quality than what was originally intended by commissioning. So, what can be done? Short of doing away with the low-bid, price-based, schedule-focused project delivery process altogether, the following is one idea.

Random Checks

It has been suggested to me that a random sample commissioning checkout and testing approach be adopted for as many systems as possible. Although it has been the opinion of many building owners that more testing equals better quality, a less-is-more theory may apply in this case. If 100% prefunctional checkout and functional performance testing is specified, the contractors know they will have to test everything, regardless of how successful the test results are.

A random sampling strategy could motivate the contractors to do everything in their power to be sure the small sample passes, if the penalty would be for them to be required to test all the remaining systems if the initial sample fails. In this scenario, the commissioning consultant would randomly choose the initial systems for testing, unknown to the contractors prior to the test day. Therefore, the contractors would want to make sure all systems were installed, started, and fully operational in order to avoid having to spend many more hours (and dollars) supporting a full test schedule.

This approach could work for a low-bid environment where the contractors want to include a minimal amount of time in their bids for testing activities in order to stay competitive. It could also work in negotiated contracts where the contractor may budget for a certain level of testing and actually successfully complete the testing in less time. That should translate into additional profit on the bottom line.

It is time to revisit the old adage that you cannot "test in" quality. This is true, and we are realizing it on projects where the contractors are doing less quality control because the commissioning process is seen as doing it for them. That is not the intent of commissioning, so the commissioning plan needs to include features to discourage that response from installation contractors. ES

es-subscribe

Recent Articles by Rebecca T. Ellis, P.E.

Prioritizing the Design Portion of Design-Build

Are Your As-Built Drawing Markups Appropriately Marked Up?

Trend Analysis for Effectiveness and Efficiency — Part 3

A Deeper Dive into Trend Analysis

Trend Analysis is a Valuable Commissioning Tool

Rebeccaellis_200

Rebecca is president of Questions & Solutions Engineering, Inc. She can be reached at rteesmag@qseng.com

Related Articles

Tomorrow's Engineer: The Real Definition Of Commissioning (December 2000)

When Building Commissioning Is Not Commissioning

Commissioning--Getting it Right: Procuring Commissioning Services

Commissioning: Getting It Right: Different Types Of Commissioning (January 2001)

Related Products

Optimizing Social Media from a B2B Perspective

Energy Systems Engineering: Evaluation and Implementation, Third Edition

Maintenance Engineering Handbook, 8E

Related Directories

alpscontrols.com

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Popular Stories

Dynamic Data Center Workloads Require a Dynamic Cooling Solution

Dynamic Data Center Workloads Require a Dynamic Cooling Solution

Protecting Pharmacists

Protecting Pharmacists: New USP 800 Standards Focus on Safety in Handling Hazardous Drugs

The Dangers of Neglecting Regular Boiler Maintenance

The Dangers of Neglecting Regular Boiler Maintenance

A2L Nov 2019 Figure 1

A2L Refrigerants: Safely Addressing Flammability Concerns

Jeff Edwards

Jeffrey W. Edwards Presented with ASPE Award of Merit

ES-20toWatch-winners250


Todays boiler

Events

December 30, 2030

Webinar Sponsorship Information

For webinar sponsorship information, visit www.bnpevents.com/webinars or email webinars@bnpmedia.com.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Favorite Engineered Systems columns

Which Engineered Systems column is your favorite:
View Results Poll Archive

Products

The Green Energy Management Book

The Green Energy Management Book

Learn from our experts how to evaluate job opportunities, market your services, sell a Walk-through Survey, target areas for an Energy Audit, calculate energy savings, do retrofit work, and win continuing contracts for retrofit work.

See More Products

ES Kohler webinar


ES_2018Top10States_360

Engineered Systems Magazine

Engineered Systems December 2019

2019 December

Check out the December 2019 edition of Engineered Systems: Discussion of the "next generation" of building controls, the health impact of indoor particulate matter, evidence-based decision-making in the built environment and much more!
View More Create Account
  • Resources
    • ES Glossary
    • HVAC glossary
    • New Products
    • Mechanical Group
    • Partners
    • List Rental
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
  • Want More
    • Connect
  • Contact

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing