For Paul Martyn, chief engineer at Fannie May, churning out chocolates is bit more complicated than an “I Love Lucy” rerun may have you believe. Maintaining precise temperature control is essential in turning out a quality product.
Martyn’s job is further complicated by the fact that the same four-boiler system provides steam for domestic hot water, building heat, and process cooking. As a result, he has to contend with wildly fluctuating demands that vary from day to day, and season to season.
The original control system, installed the same time as the four Cleaver Brooks (Milwaukee) fire tube boilers in 1971, had to be manually controlled. In addition to tying up tremendous manpower, this method of control left the system vulnerable to human error — not to mention loss of product. Boilers were occasionally left on too long - while others grew cold leaving them susceptible to thermal shock. As facility workers struggled to manually sequence the boilers, the inevitable signs of thermal stress began to appear.
Searching for ControlIn 1997, the boilers underwent a major overhaul that brought them up to Cleaver Brooks’ current manufacturing standards. It was an endeavor that Paul Martyn wanted to ensure was worthwhile.
Specifically, he wanted to be able to control and sequence the boilers without incurring undue wear and tear on the equipment. For help, he turned to Chris Koepke of CB-Kramer Sales and Service, the Cleaver Brooks representative in Illinois. Koepke immediately thought of Larry Maroff, Chicago representative for Heat-Timer (Fairfield, NJ), and the successes Maroffhad had using Heat-Timer boiler controls.
“I first contacted Larry who suggested that we take a trip to the Chicago Fire Department Training Center,” said Koepke. “Larry wanted me to see firsthand how well the Heat-Timer MOD-4 control worked. I was impressed. The next day I went to see Paul with the suggestion.”
How Sweet It IsThe trio conducted a thorough analysis of the Fannie May factory application and concluded that installing a Heat-Timer MOD-4 controller would result in a 10% reduction in fuel cost. That would translate into a payback of less than a year, making the project sufficiently appealing.
The MOD-4 combines modulation and sequencing (and now rotation) in a single control. Upon an initial call for heat, the MOD4 fires the first burner to a pre-selected level. If more capacity is required, the control brings on a second boiler, and then a third, etc., always starting from low fire and modulating up. PID-type logic allows the control to examine the rate of change in the system temperature, so that the control backs off as the temperature approaches set point. This means that demand and energy input remain closely aligned, so that fuel consumption is kept to a minimum.
The installation of the MOD-4 proved a “sweeter” deal than anyone had anticipated. In fact, fuel reduction far exceeded everyone’s expectations. While the plant typically operated at least three boilers year round, they found that with the new control system, they could usually meet demand in the summer with a single boiler and two or three boilers in the winter. According to Martyn, the fourth boiler is almost never needed.
“We estimated a 10% reduction in fuel cost and got a 20% reduction,” he said.
More Good NewsEven though the new control system had improved operation and energy consumption significantly, Martyn had some ideas for improvement. A change in the pattern of demand at the factory prompted him to inquire about the possibility of “tweaking” the control to make it better suit his purposes. He wanted to be able to rotate lead boilers more frequently that the 24-hour automatic rotation that the standard control provided.
“At first we were rotating the lead boiler every 24 hours,” said Martyn. “This meant that the lead boiler may only be on every two to four days, so it would cool way down, increasing the risk of thermal shock.”
He turned to Maroff with his concerns. Maroff immediately began working with Heat-Timer to initiate development of a new processing chip which would allow Martyn to rotate boilers every eight hours. Approximately one month later, the process chip was in place at the Fannie May factory.
In addition to more frequent rotation, this new chip extended the amount of time the secondary boiler spends at low fire. Previously, the secondary boiler would hold at low fire for 2 to 3 min before modulating up, or cycling off depending on demand. However, because the factory had such extreme and sudden fluctuations in demand, the secondary boiler was cycling off prematurely only to fire again minutes later because demand would suddenly shoot up. Thanks to Heat-Timer’s modifications, the control is even better equipped to satisfy the factory’s erratic demand patterns.
Koepke credits Martyn’s engineering skills for recognizing the need for additional fine tuning. He also has high praises for Heat-Timer. “I’ve never seen a manufacturer respond so quickly to a customer’s specific needs — particularly when it came to developing a new part,” remarked Koepke. “It was really amazing.” ES