This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Last month's column was the first in a series about establishing a post-commissioning training program that provides ongoing "second-generation" training to help maintain optimum, long-term system performance and realize the full value of the commissioning process.
This month's column focuses on the factors that influence the decision to design and implement a training program, or to redesign an existing program that better serves the current and future training needs of the O&M staff. This "go/no go" decision is based on the perceived value of training and the expected ROI, of which are determined by examining the potential costs and benefits of training.