Lakefront Library: Radiant Systems Meet Natural Ventilation
by David Lavan
Don McLauchlan P.E., CEM, LEED® AP
December 1, 2008
 |
| Figure
1. The
radiant cooling system used in the ceiling at Klarchek Information
Commons was designed to meet 60% of the sensible cooling load with
approximately 4 W/sq ft of cooling power at 80% ceiling coverage. |
|
ust
as this university stayed ahead of the curve with its digital
library, designers harnessed the benefits of radiant heating and
cooling with the advantages of natural HVAC. With a building that
frequently employs hybrid or all-natural modes, readers and
researchers can enjoy lower-impact comfort to go with the sights and
sounds of Lake Michigan.
Loyola
University Chicago’s (LUC) new digital library, named Klarchek
Information Commons began with very ambitious goals. The university
wanted a visually transparent, energy-efficient building built on the
shores of Lake Michigan where students could learn and exchange
information digitally in a “book-less” library. With the
lakeshore location, there was an additional goal of creating an
indoor experience similar to being outdoors on a beautiful day. To
meet these aggressive goals, Solomon Cordwell and Buenz (SCB,
architect) assembled the design team of Transsolar (indoor climate
consultant), Elara Energy Services (MEPFP engineer), and Halvorson
and Partners (structural engineer). Unlike much traditional
construction, this project required a very high level of integration
and coordination with all the design elements of the building. The
building was complete in January 2007 and has attained LEED®
Silver certification.
Typically, the
percentage of glass necessary to achieve transparency is not
complementary with the goal of energy efficiency. In an effort to
maximize the views of the lake, and to further complicate matters,
the building was oriented with its primary axis running almost near
north-south. This design parameter created additional challenges to
control glare and solar heat gain loads on the building.
The
building is approximately 70,000 sq ft, with three full floors and a
partial fourth floor. There are three floors of large open space in
the center of the building, with all-glass east-west facades flanked
by traditionally constructed bookends. There are classroom/seminar
rooms in the bookends and open study areas with partially
glass-partitioned group study areas in the center open area. There is
a ground-floor café and connecting links to the existing
traditional library and chapel. The main building access is through a
“winter garden” entry space on the west side. The roof is
partially vegetative.
To meet these
considerable challenges the following innovative strategies were
implemented.
Ventilated, Double façade windows with interstitial shading
 |
| FIGURE 2. Computational flow dynamics was used to design Klarchek Information Commons at Loyola University Chicago. |
|
In
order to mitigate solar heat gain on the west side and improve the
overall “U” factor of the glass façade, a double skin was
selected. The motorized Venetian blinds in the interstitial space
deploy when needed to block direct sunlight and control glare. The
interstitial space is naturally ventilated with intake air entering
through cavity dampers at the bottom and exhausting through awning
windows located at the top of the four-story glass stack. It was
determined through CFD modeling that a negative pressure would be
created at the top of the glass stack to enhance the chimney effect
and naturally ventilate this space, regardless of wind direction
Natural ventilation
|
|
| FIGURE 3. A BAS graphic of the radiant ceiling. |
|
With
the building located within a green campus environment and
immediately adjacent to the lake, this project was an ideal candidate
to take full advantage of nature whenever possible to create indoor
comfort. To accomplish this, automatically controlled windows were
used on the east façade, as well as on the inner windows on
the west double façade (Figure 2). These windows, in
conjunction with the motorized awning windows at the top of the glass
stack, allows for exceedingly effective natural ventilation
throughout the open areas. This effectiveness is achieved with the
combination of the negative pressure created by the thermal buoyancy
of warm air in the west side interstitial space as well as the effect
of the wind blowing across the top of the glass stack. This draws air
through the inner west side windows, across the open areas, from the
windows on the lakeside of the building to the east. Furthermore,
with the inclusion of massive concrete ceilings, the night’s
“coolness” could be harvested to aid in conditioning the space on
the following day. It was predicted through modeling that
approximately one-third of the occupied hours of the year, the
building would be conditioned naturally.
Radiant ceilings
|
|
| FIGURE 4. Heat recovery mode. |
|
Radiant
heating technologies have long been used in the United States, but
only recently has radiant cooling gained increasing acceptance. The
following are some of the advantages of radiant heating and cooling.
Comfort/with
more energy temperate setpoints. It
has been shown that people are comfortable at lower temperatures in
heating and at higher temperatures while in cooling when exposed to
radiant ceilings or floors. This is due to the radiant energy
exchange between the occupant and surrounding heated/chilled
surfaces. For example, depending on the temperature of the ceiling,
68°F may feel like 70° in heating, and 77° may feel like
75° in cooling. This operative temperature is a weighted average
of air temperature and average surrounding surface temperatures.
The
radiant energy exchange is governed by the Stefan-Boltmann equation.
Using an accepted value of 0.87 for the radiation exchange factor,
this equation becomes (using equation 5 from the 2008
ASHRAE Handbook – Systems and Equipment,
page 6.2): Qr
= 0.15 x 10^-8 [(tp)^4 – (AUST)^4] Where Qr
= radiant cooling, Btuh/sq ft tp = mean panel
surface temperature, °R
AUST
= area weighted average temperature of the non-radiant panel surfaces
of the room, °R In
addition to the radiant energy exchange, there is also a convective
component. This component can be approximated with the following
equation (ASHRAE 2008): Qc
= 0.31 [tp-ta]^0.31 (tp-ta) Where Qc
= natural convection from a cooled ceiling, Btuh/sq ft ta
= AUST for ceiling cooled spaces with large proportions of exposed
fenestration, °R Lower
distribution energy.
Due to the excellent thermal properties of water, the transport
energy associated with a radiant system (pump energy) is
significantly lower than the equivalent transport energy for an air
system (fan energy). Some of the challenges
associated with radiant systems
include:
- Controlling
the indoor dewpoint in the cooling mode to avoid condensation on the
surface of the radiant panels
- The
slow response to step loads typical of massive radiant systems
At
Klarchek Information Commons, the decision was made to use
cross-linked polypropylene (PEX) tubing imbedded in the pre-cast
concrete ceiling panels. The 5/8-in. PEX tubing was placed a few
inches above the surface at 6-in. centers. Due to the contour of the
coffered ceiling, care had to be taken to avoid air traps. A spiral
pattern of the tubing was incorporated to minimize temperature
gradients across the slab. The manifolds were placed underneath the
structural raised floor, which was used throughout the building.
The
ceiling system was designed to meet 60% of the design sensible
cooling load, with approximately 4 W/sq ft of cooling power at 80%
ceiling coverage. An underfloor air system
(UFAS) was designed to provide ventilation air and supplement the
radiant cooling systems on design days. To improve overall
dehumidification and lower indoor dewpoint temperatures, the air
handlers that supplied air to the UFAS were custom designed.
In heating mode, the air handlers operate as
a variable DOAS with heat recovery (Figure 4). There are individual
VAV boxes, which in heating mode respond to measured CO 2
levels
in the space. In
cooling mode, a runaround coil was designed to enhance the latent
heat/moisture removal of the outside air. A separate return air path
was used to further dehumidify the space. The return air path uses a
stacked coil arrangement allowing part of the air to be cooled low
enough to effectively dehumidify the air. The temperature of the
conditioned outside air path and the conditioned return path were set
as equal and mixed at the blower. Since these air handlers supply the
open areas of the library, the space is treated as one large zone
from a CO 2
standpoint.
The delivered volume of outside air is controlled by the highest
measured CO 2
in the space. The individual boxes in cooling are controlled by
measured CO 2
|
|
| FIGURE 5. An airside graphic. |
|
To
further enhance dehumidification in the space, the bookend
seminar/classrooms are conditioned by a traditional VAV ceiling
supply system to respond to the anticipated step cooling loads. The
supply of the air to those spaces was designed at 51.5° to
provide good de-humidification. Since there is no significant vapor
barrier between the bookends and the open areas this lowers the
overall humidity in the building. Sensors are embedded in the ceiling
to monitor the actual ceiling surface temperature. The BAS maintains
the ceiling temperature in cooling between 62° to 67° as
required for cooling, or 3° higher than the measured indoor
dewpoint. In cooling mode, the space temperature is trimmed with the
UFAS. Improved
plant efficiency. Since
the ceiling is maintained between 62° to 67° in cooling, 56°
to 58° return water to the central plant is used to chill the
ceilings. This increases the return water temperature to the central
chilled water plant and increases the overall efficiency of the
chillers. Another benefit is that no additional primary chilled water
is used and the additional hydronic pressure drop of the chillers and
associated auxiliaries is avoided. In heating mode, this same
dual-temperature loop supplies warm water from the central plant for
the radiant ceiling and the other systems requiring hot
water. Daylighting.
An
automatic digitally controlled dimming system harvests natural
daylight and reduces required artificial light energy.
Demand
controlled ventilation. CO2
sensors were installed throughout the space to control the volume of
outside air required while maintaining the space IAQ. Heat
recovery. The
system recovers approximately 45% of the available energy from the
exhaust air to precondition the outside air needed for ventilation
(Figure 4). External/internal
shading. The
west-side façade has motorized Venetian blinds that are
controlled by the BAS. The blinds are only deployed when both the
celestial calculations of the sun position and the ambient external
light sensor determine that external shading is required. When
required, the blinds are lowered and the angle of the 4-in. slats is
adjusted based on the angle of the sun’s rays. On the east façade,
there are motorized rollup shades that are controlled in a similar
manner except that there is only one degree of motion.
Hybrid
mode. To
further reduce cooling and fan energy, the building has a hybrid mode
where the system is in natural ventilation (all the fans are off and
the windows are open) and the radiant chilled ceiling is activated.
In this mode, the outdoor dewpoint is equal to the indoor dewpoint,
requiring additional precautions to avoid condensation. The ceiling
temperature is kept 5° above the outdoor/indoor dewpoint in this
mode. Intelligent
control. It
was imperative that all these dynamic systems be integrated into the
BAS. BACnet® was used as the backbone to integrate standalone
system protocols. The BAS was integrated into the campus-wide network
to allow the monitoring and operation of the building. Electric
submeters and Btu meters were installed and connected to the BAS to
provide real-time monitoring of the energy usage and long-term
trending. Energy
model and actual results. The
design model predicted 52% less energy usage than an ASHRAE 90.1-base
building, excluding computer/plug loads. Figure 3 provides a summary
of the design energy model with computer/plug loads based on 24/7
operation. Chilled water is supplied from a
central plant with a measured average efficiency of 0.6 kW/ton,
including the tower fans and pump energy. Heating is supplied via the
central steam plant, with an average measured steam to fuel
efficiency of 82.5%. During a 30-day period in
July/August, the system was in natural or hybrid mode approximately
37% of the time. During one 84° day, it was observed that the
building was being cooled with only 32 tons of cooling. It was
further observed that the base plug-load energy was higher than
anticipated. Field measurements showed that over 50% of the total
electric usage (including space cooling) was attributed to computers
(over 300 PCs) and plug loads. Currently, the university IT
department keeps the computers in ready mode at all times. This has
resulted in an average computer plug load of 1 W/sq ft. Even with
higher-than-anticipated computer usage, the total building
performance is as expected.
Lessons learned
The
natural ventilation system was the most challenging to commission.
Loyola’s project management team is still working through some
issues with unreliable window actuators and insect screens on the
east facade. Despited these issues, the building has performed better
than expected in natural-ventilation mode. Typically, the system is
operating in either natural or hybrid when outside air temperatures
are between 55° and 75°. The indoor temperature can generally
be maintained within 1°F of the outside temperature. This
translates to approximately 5 cfm/sq ft of outside air. Further, the
audible experience of the rhythm of the waves on Lake Michigan adds
to the aesthetic appeal of the facility.
Although
we are still optimizing the systems and expect to further improve the
facility’s energy efficiency, feedback from students and staff has
been incredible. The goal of the university was to create an
environment that meets the three C’s: Collaboration, Connectivity,
and Community. All the current feedback suggests that these goals are
being met. ES
Sidebar 1: Green Construction Institute: Advanced Learning For A Sustainable Future
Hill
Mechanical Group, part of the team for this project, is a member of
the Mechanical Contractors Association (MCA) of Chicago and employs
workers from United Association Pipe Fitters Local Union 597, who
receive green training from MCA Chicago’s Green Construction
Institute. MCA
Chicago established the Green Construction Institute to further the
cause of sustainable practices in the construction industry. In
addition to Local 597 apprentices and journeymen, the Institute also
offers educational opportunities to the association’s member
contractors, as well as engineers, city officials, and building
owners, among others. “Education
is a top initiative of the association,” said Stephen Lamb,
executive vice president of MCA Chicago. “For three years, the
association has been instructing our member contractors on
sustainable technology. This year, we decided it was time to
formalize our efforts by founding the Green Construction
Institute.” “Any
business in the construction industry that ignores sustainable
technology runs the risk of being left behind — and losing market
share,” stated Dan Bulley, senior vice president of MCA Chicago,
executive director of the Green Construction Institute, and a LEED®
Accredited Professional (AP). The
Green Construction Institute’s educational offerings include the
following:
- Introductory
course in green building for contractors
- Apprentice
and craft training
- Technical,
equipment and design: Training on green building methods and
materials
- Legal
and insurance advice
- LEED AP
training
- Marketing: How to promote
green building to clients
- CEO
training: How business leaders can position their
companies
- Owner training: Online
seminars for owners on LEED Existing Building (EB) and New
Construction (NC)
- Visioning: How
green building will intersect in the future with build-B, building
information modeling (BIM), and other industry
developments
- Green building
publications
- LEED consulting
services
- Contractor assistance to
find financing options on energy payback
projects
- Contractor and/or owner
assistance to find grants for green
projects
This
September, MCA Chicago and the Green Construction Institute moved
from a suite in downtown Chicago to their new headquarters in a green
building in Burr Ridge, IL. The building was built and equipped with
low-emitting materials, which contribute to better IAQ by releasing
minimal toxins over time. “Not
only do attendees of the Green Construction Institute learn the
latest in sustainable technology,” Bulley said, “but they also
enjoy the comfort of a healthier indoor environment as they
learn.” To
find out more about MCA Chicago, visit www.mca.org.
|