Engineered Systems
  Home
  Subscribe
  eNewsletters
  Online
  Web Features
  Webinars
  Podcasts
  Blog
  White Papers
  Products
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Case In Point
  Issues and Events
  Departments
  Letters to the Editor
  Green Intelligent Buildings Supplement
  ES Glossary
  Calendar of Events
  HVAC Challenge
  HVAC Designer Tips
  Product Info(Free)
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Career Center
  Back2Basics
  Mechanical Products Sourcebook
  Industry Links
  Market Research
  PennWell Books
  ES Info
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Deal with IT
by Kevin Heslin
August 14, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



In the past few months, I have read both The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell and The Bottomless Well by Peter Huber and Mark Mills. In a way both predict the future of energy use in the U.S., as I realized today during a panel session at Schneider Electric's Initiative 2008. Of course, both theories predict vastly different futures.
The Tipping Point, not normally considered an energy publication, merely suggests that when enough early adopters and connectors believe in an idea it becomes a matter of time until that idea becomes inevitable, at least as I understood the text. The work has been so widely disseminated that speakers will reference the tipping point as a business axiom. Hence, the combination of Hubbert's peak, $140 per barrel oil, and climate change politics makes it inevitable that we will conserve energy. Panelists at the Schneider event also cited supply constraints from lack of new electric generation and transmission construction as further enducement to be energy efficient and save energy.
Not surprisingly, Huber and Mills offer a different view in their 2005 book, which is about energy and human nature. They opine that energy efficiency is not an energy-saving tactic, if that term is synonymous with load reduction. In a recent edition of Mission Critical, Christian Belady of Microsoft labelled this phenomena Jevons' Paradox and applied it to data centers.
Huber and Mills go further yet and suggest that energy efficiency is an engine for load growth, and they harness steam engines, locomotives, iPods, x-rays, lasers, and cell phones to make their case. They further suggest that this is a good thing, as energy-intensive activities will prove to be the solution to, and not the cause of, our environmental troubles.
Huber and Mills seem to have history on their side, but I wonder if their curve can continue on forever. I wonder, too, if energy efficiency has finally attained the tipping point, just as it seemed destined to do so many times in the past. That's a problem with grand theories of how the world works: their flaws only become visible in hindsight.



Kevin Heslin
heslink@bnpmedia.com
Heslin is the editor of Mission Critical Magazine, and he is a contributing editor for Engineered Systems.


  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 



 



Please enter the verification code as it appears in the box above.
 
BNP Media