Commissioning Fire Protection Systems
by Andy Shanahan
July 1, 2010
One
proposed document — NFPA 3 — would outline recommended practice
for the commissioning process. See where it stands.
The
NFPA is currently working to develop a new document, NFPA 3,
“Commissioning of Fire Protection Systems.” The scope of the
document is to provide guidelines for the commissioning process and
requirements for the integrated testing of fire protection and life
safety systems. Often, these systems are tested individually without
regard to the other, compromising the performance of all systems. The
proposed document can be utilized in any building with integrated
fire protection and life safety systems that will undergo
commissioning.
NFPA 3 defines integrated
systems as “a combination or group of systems either interconnected
or separate but required to operate together as a whole to achieve
the fire protection and life safety objectives.” Automatic
sprinkler, fire alarm, and smoke control systems are examples of
systems with such interdependency. These systems are often designed
and installed in a vacuum. The designers and installers of one system
may not fully understand the impact their design may have on another
interconnected system. This issue is prevalent in today’s practice,
resulting in last-minute design and installation changes, project
delays, and unanticipated project expense.
For
example, consider a smoke control system found within a modern
high-rise or a covered mall building. Such a system is considered
vital to occupant safety, especially for a high-rise building, where
the height of the building limits exterior fire department operations
and prolongs occupant egress time. A smoke control system receives
initiation inputs from the fire alarm and sprinkler systems and sends
activation outputs to the building’s mechanical system.
Additionally, the secondary power, elevator, passive construction,
and electrical systems must respond to the actions of the smoke
control system. Failure to coordinate any of these systems with each
other will result in system failure.
APPLICABILITY
NFPA
3 will not require commissioning of any fire protection and life
safety systems, but it will serve as a scoping document outlining
recommended practices for how to perform these processes. These
procedures can be used by design teams to increase efficiency as well
as ensure the owner that the building will meet their expectations
and the requirements of the applicable codes.
Currently,
code officials can require integrated testing and commissioning, but
no specific procedures exist for project teams to follow. The
establishment of a recommended procedure would provide code officials
with a specific document to reference for any project within their
jurisdiction containing integrated fire protection and life safety
systems.
COMMISSIONING PROCESS
Commissioning
is defined in the draft version of Commissioning of Fire Protection
Systems NFPA 3 as a “Systematic process that provides documented
confirmation that specific and interconnected fire and life safety
systems function according to the intended design criteria set forth
in the project documents and satisfy the owner’s operational needs,
including compliance requirements of any applicable laws,
regulations, codes, and standards requiring fire and life safety
systems.”
The document outlines the
commissioning process as beginning before the design phase of the
project. In this pre-design phase, the fire protection and life
safety commissioning team will be established. It will consist
primarily of the building owner, the agent coordinating the
commissioning of the fire protection and life safety systems, and the
registered design professionals. As the project progresses,
additional stakeholders will be added as the project scope requires
their participation.
The team may ultimately
consist of the following stakeholders: building owner, commissioning
authority overseeing the entire commissioning process, fire
commissioning agent, registered design professionals, installation
contractor(s), construction manager or general contractor,
manufacturer’s representative(s), owner’s technical support
personnel, insurance representative, third-party test entity, and the
authority having jurisdiction.
However,
commissioning is a fluid process that will not be the same from
project to project, and NFPA 3 identifies these stakeholders as
potential commissioning team members but does not require their
involvement. In the pre-design phase, the team would be responsible
for developing the owner’s project requirements for these systems,
identifying applicable code requirements, developing the
commissioning scope, and preparing the preliminary commissioning plan
(CP).
The CP will be a working document for
the design team throughout the design, construction, and life cycle
of the building. NFPA 3 outlines what is required to be in this plan,
including project information, stakeholder information, required
tasks, schedule, required documentation, testing procedures,
recommended training, and establishment of periodic testing
frequency. All information in the CP must be specific to the project
and the individual systems.
During the design
phase, the design intent of the systems is established. The basis of
design (BofD) is created, and project documentation is reviewed for
coordination with the BofD. The commissioning team works alongside
the members of the design team to ensure that the project
requirements are being met and that the CP is updated as required.
Prior to the construction phase, a preconstruction conference will
ensure the team and those performing the work understand the
schedule, procedures, and processing outlined in the commissioning
plan. Installation and testing will occur as required by the CP. The
team will be involved throughout the acceptance testing and will
provide closeout documents. These will include an outlined list of
deficiencies and resolutions, O&M manuals, testing results and
certificates, sequence of operations, and a plan for periodic
integrated testing (recommissioning).
PERIODIC INTEGRATED TESTING
Integrated
testing is defined as “performance verification of the interaction
and coordination of multiple and separate fire and life safety
systems.” NFPA 3 outlines how interconnected systems will be tested
periodically to verify correct operation of these systems over the
lifespan of the building. The periodic testing of many of these
systems is regulated by the individual standards; NFPA 72 for fire
alarm systems, NFPA 25 for automatic fire sprinkler systems, etc.
However, buildings that undergo the
commissioning process outlined in NFPA 3 will have a commissioning
plan in place that identifies how the integrated testing of these
systems will be performed. This plan will take into account the
requirements of all these individual standards and apply a schedule
for testing the systems individually or as part of the integrated
fire protection and life safety strategy. Completion of this testing
is documented in accordance with the requirements of the individual
component system standards.
Existing buildings
that did not undergo the commissioning process outlined in NFPA 3 can
still be subject to the integrated testing requirements. If new
systems are added, existing component systems become interconnected,
or the interconnections or sequence of operations of existing
integrated systems are modified, the integrated testing requirements
may be applied.
ACCEPTANCE OF NFPA 3
The
most recent committee meeting was held April 13-15, 2010, in North
Carolina. This meeting was considered an ROP meeting, which the
committee used to further revise the document in preparation to post
a second ROP draft. At this point, members of the public are able to
offer their comments for consideration by the committee to be used in
the ROC document. ES
|