On the Radar: High-Pressure Steam Measurement
by Rob Vermeulen
February 1, 2010
|
|
|
Figure
1.
Sight glass and bypass on drum-level application.
|
|
Conditions
inside steam drums and other high-temperature and pressure
applications can raise some real obstacles to true level measurement.
Here, the author starts by looking at these impediments and some
traditional strategies to compensate for these conditions, and then
he suggests some ways guided wave radar and new compensation tactics
can combine for consistently accurate readings.
Radar
technology in general has been introduced to the process industry as
a measurement technology that uses high-frequency electromagnetic
waves that are not influenced by the gas phase they travel through or
by the temperature and pressure conditions in process vessels. As
processes involve more extreme temperatures and pressures, it is time
to have a closer look at radar behavior in those critical
applications and their solutions and also at the mechanical designs
of such measurement devices.
Mechanical Design
Designing
a guided-wave radar device or free-space radar device that can
withstand extreme conditions is very difficult. It requires know-how
of materials and understanding radar behavior in extreme conditions.
It also requires know-how to construct a safe and reliable radar that
meets the highest industry standards like SIL 2 for both
software/algorithm and hardware development (IEC61508) and which is
actually proven in use for these extreme application (IEC 61511).
|
|
| Table
1.
Temperature and pressure effects on the dielectric constant of steam.
|
|
Meeting
these requirements should not be taken lightly; however, having a
safe mechanical design does not necessarily make a radar device safe
to use. Electronics should be able to differentiate between level
signal and false readings and react in a safe, predictable way.
Having a redundant measurement signal evaluation in the same device
(EOP evaluation) makes it even safer.
Materials
The
speed of radar is highly influenced by the impedance of the system it
has to travel through or along, so the distance of an antenna to a
wall of a bypass or chamber influences the speed of a radar signal.
This is true for the mechanical stability and stress of the parts
that transport the radar signal from the HF module to the rod/cable
or antenna coupling inside a tank or bypass.
A
simple example is the ceramic used for mechanical stability and
isolation material in FMP45, Levelflex-guided wave radar. When one
applies 5,800 psi, at 540°F,
to that piece of ceramic, the dielectric constant of that ceramic
part changes. This change influences the impedance of the system and
thus the noise and propagation speed of a radar signal emitted though
it.
Radar Signals
|
|
|
Figure
2.
Boiler-level control.
|
|
All
radar technologies on the market that are used to measure level use
the “time of flight” principle. This means the device measures
the elapsed time between emitting and receiving a pulse consisting of
a bundle of high-frequency electromagnetic waves. The frequencies of
the waves vary between 1 GHz for guided wave devices and 6 to 26 GHz
for free space radars.
Speed of Radar Signals
Radar
signals travel at the speed of light in a vacuum. This speed varies
outside a vacuum. The pressure and temperature of a specific gas
phase or liquid also influences the speed of radar signals. The
extent of this influence depends on how polarized the gas is — in
other words, how much the dielectric constant of the gas phase varies
due to temperature or pressure changes in the application.
Hydrocarbon vapors show little change even under high-temperature or
high-pressure process conditions, but high polar steam does. The
dielectric constant of steam at 212°F is 1.005806. But at 691°F, it
is already 3.086.
Steam System Applications
There
are several critical boiler system control points, with the primary
one being the boiler level control. The second is the level control
of the feed water to the boiler and the condensate return level.
Boiler
level control. In a typical steam application, the
level of the water in a boiler is of utmost importance. Radar
measurement devices are used more and more in these critical
applications. They offer advanced diagnostics and insensitivity to
build-up and temperature fluctuations that bother other measurement
systems, such as those that use differential pressure devices and
displacers. Both use the “density” of the product to determine
the level, but the density of water changes significantly enough in a
boiler system to lead potentially to large measurement errors between
the “real” level in the boiler and the measured value.
|
|
| Figure
3.
Reference rod located in the gas area. |
|
These
errors affect the amount and quality of steam a boiler produces. Not
operating a boiler at its critical point leads to higher energy costs
per ton of steam and reduces the life of the boiler itself. Too high
a water level produces bad quality steam that can cause droplets of
water in a steam system. Droplets of water traveling at high speeds
are devastating for control elements, piping, and turbines. Too low a
water level can cause damage to the heating tubes in a boiler and
eventually lead to overheating. This again can lead to the explosion
of a boiler. Boiler
feed water control and condensate return. The
surface of a receiving tank for condensate return can be turbulent.
This not only makes it difficult to measure with free space radar,
but it also leads to issues regarding changing radar speeds and also
condensation on the free-space radar antenna. It is not simple to use
differential pressure in these applications. There can be large
temperature shocks, especially during the start-up phase of a boiler
system. Furthermore, the density of the liquid can change over
temperature, leading to large measurement errors. A much more
reliable system is a guided-wave radar device with gas-phase
compensation in a co-ax pipe.
Steam: a Difficult Medium
Steam
is a highly polar gas, which means that the speed of radar signals in
high pressure and temperature steam applications may be reduced. In a
boiler, for instance, this leads to a lower-than-actual water level
reading. This can be dangerous, influencing the performance of
boilers and causing a reduction in the quality of steam. This error
can easily be as large as 30% to 40%, depending on the pressure and
temperature of the steam and distance from the launch of the signal
to the actual water level.
Process Changes and Radar Speed
The
simplest (but not the best) way to overcome the effects of process
changes on radar speed is to input the temperature or pressure and
have the radar unit calculate the “offset.” The method will cause
large errors during the start-up of an installation. Normal operating
conditions have not yet been met, and thus the unit will
overcompensate. One could also program a compensation table in a DCS
or PLC and connect this to a pressure or temperature transmitter.
The Right Way: ‘Built-in’ Dynamic Compensation
|
|
| Figure
4.
Dynamic gas-phase compensation. |
|
The
more accurate method of compensating for the effects of process
changes through the dynamic compensation circuit on a guided wave
radar. A reference signal at a known distance is used to compensate
for the delay in speed of the radar signal measuring the water level.
This is done dynamically — for example, when the reference pulse
signal shows a small shift in time, the level signal will be
compensated for this small shift. In converse, if the reference
signal shows a large shift, then the level signal will be compensated
for this large shift.
Conclusion
The
use of radar signals in high-temperature and high-pressure
applications in especially polar gasses is not as simple as it
sounds. Under these conditions, the speed of radar signals can change
causing large measuring errors. Using guided wave radar offers a
unique solution to compensate for changing radar signal speeds,
offering peace of mind and confidence in the accuracy of the level
process measurement. ES
|