Fighting The Flu
by Robert Beverly
November 1, 2009
|
|
| Figure
1.
NAFA
reports that while HEPA filters are rated by using a challenge of 0.3
micrometers, they are actually much more effective at even lower
particle sizes. |
|
The
H1N1 “swine flu” virus has made headlines during its second pass
through the United States’ population — including, finally and
ironically, an American pig. Understanding transmission methods for
H1N1 and influenza in general, and knowing which ventilation or
filtration countermeasures could be useful, may spell the difference
in the health of dozens or even hundreds of people in a facility
during cold and flu season.
Let’s
get one thing straight right off the bat: You cannot contract the
H1N1 virus — aka, “swine flu” — by eating pork or pork
products. In terms of human health, pigs are not the problem. In
fact, not until last month did the USDA confirm the first-ever case
of a U.S. pig catching the virus, that at the Minnesota State Fair
where the local Pioneer Press
reported that a few 4-H members also became ill. (So as far as we
know, pigs may be referring to this disease amongst themselves as
“Gangly Teenager Flu.”)
Nevertheless, as
National Air Filtration Association (NAFA) president Bill Veeck says,
even though “its projected impact and spread has been diminished
from earlier announcements of a pandemic, it is still a serious
illness and one that can cause death.”
What
are organizations like the EPA, ASHRAE, and NAFA saying and doing
about this twist to the usual cold and flu season? How are filtration
manufacturers responding now that the disease’s fall wave is
underway? Let’s have a look.
Fight the Flu with a Web
The
EPA is currently hosting slides from a worthwhile presentation on the
virus’ transmission and HVAC strategies, made by Steven Welty,
CAFS, CIE, LEED®
AP of Green Clean Air (Reston, VA) at the agency’s June meeting of
the Federal Interagency Committee for IAQ. The full materials await
at www.epa.gov/iaq/ciaq/influenza_presentation.pdf.
Here are a few elements of interest that caught my
eye. Handwashing
doesn’t fix everything. “No matter how sterile your
hands are, you’ll still be fully exposed to airborne Influenza
viruses entering and depositing into your lungs to cause
disease.” Location,
location, location.
Infectious droplet nuclei can circulate throughout buidings via HVAC
systems, with the help of pressure differences between areas of the
building, or via unsafe proximity of bathroom exhaust vents to fresh
air vents. Low
absolute humidity is the enemy. “Viruses evaporate
faster in low absolute humidity levels, thus creating more droplet
nuclei,” and the condition also “allows droplet nuclei to stay
airborne longer, as droplets do not absorb water weight which would
cause them to fall to the ground.” Your
arsenal. Five weapons for killing or capturing and
sterilizing the virus are high-MERV and/or HEPA filters, germicidal
UV lights, magnetized air media filtration, cold plasma bipolar
ionization, and photocatalytic oxidation. Drop
the exhaust. Due to toilet water aerosolization of
viruses, bathroom ceiling exhaust fans can pull virions up into the
breathing zone. Bathroom exhausts located a foot or less from the
floor would increase health & safety by pulling them down and
out. Again, the presentation at that URL
includes smuch more background, information, illustrations, and
conclusions. I recommend it for personal general knowledge as well as
professional enlightenment.
As For ASHRAE …
The
Society has published its Airborne Infectious Diseases Position
Document Committee. You can find it at
www.ashrae.org/aboutus/page/335.
In a related release, ASHRAE president Gordon Holness said, “While
the long-standing public health view is that influenza transmission
occurs through direct contact or large droplets, newer data suggests
it also occurs through the airborne route, meaning HVACR systems may
contribute far more to transmission of the disease and, potentially,
to reduction of that same transmission risk.” The
position paper examines the impact of ventilation on such diseases in
general, issues associated with the flu, and what control strategies
are available for implementation. Beyond the “arsenal” mentioned
it above, it also mentions laminar flow and related tactics as
appropriate for some medical and other applications. It
also explores the respective advantages of various types of
ultraviolet (UV) strategies: “installation into ventilation ducts,
irradiation of the upper zones of occupied spaces, and in-room
irradiation after one occupant and before the
next.” Engineers might find particular
reference value in the tables at the end of the paper. They detail
diseases and related manifestations/at-risk populations (divided by
whether a disease is transmitted by droplet and airborne transmission
or not). A third table provides a quick cross-reference between
occupancy types, HVAC strategies pertinent for each of those types,
and research priority for each.
NAFA Knowledge
At
this point, I’d like to quote NAFA president Veeck, whose input
helps clarify the picture regarding specific types of filter media
and their efficacy in this particular context. “We
at NAFA are currently writing a Position Paper on Airborne Infectious
Diseases – not to compete with the ASHRAE paper by the same name,
but to compliment issues either ignored or presented incorrectly,
with emphasis on air filtration for the removal of particles from the
air, including virally infectious particles. “While
most people do not believe that High Efficiency Particulate Air
(HEPA) filters capture very small viral particles because they are
below the filter test challenge of 0.3 micrometers, the air
filtration industry and health care professionals know that HEPA
filters do capture viruses and have been using them in healthcare
facilities and equipment such as biological safety cabinets for
decades. It is true that HEPA filters are rated by using a challenge
of 0.3 micrometers; HEPA filters are much more effective at even
lower particle sizes (Figure 1). “Even
filters of lower minimum efficiency reporting values (MERV) capture
viral particles because of the filtration principle of diffusion. In
2003, NAFA was part of a study done by the EPA that showed several
different air filters’ abilities to remove viral particles in one
pass. For example, using an MS2 viral phage dispersed as a
micrometer-sized polydispersed aerosol, a clean MERV 6 filter
(typical filter found in commercial and residential applications) had
an efficiency of 25%, and when loaded with dust, an 83% efficiency.
“Influenza is spread by several means, and
the respiratory route is but one. We do know that air that contains
more particles provides an opportunistic environment for the spread
of viral particles by the respiratory route. We also know that
particles and viruses can be removed from an airstream in one pass
with higher levels of air filtration. Therefore, air filtration is
one good method of helping prevent the spread of viruses in the
environment.” Review NAFA’s collection of
info and related links at www.nafahq.org.
Manufacturing Response
Companies
specializing in filtration are predictably seeing an increase in
inquiries. In addition, one particular product segment that has seen
an uptick in interest ever since the spring’s first H1N1 wave is
UVC. Meredith Stines is the president/CEO of
American Ultraviolet ( www.americanultraviolet.com).
Recalling the different ways one can attack this problem with UVC
mentioned in the ASHRAE position paper, his company’s TB series and
Corner mount series fixtures are designed for upper room
sterilization, while its CC and DC series are designed for
installation on cooling coils and inside of air ducts to eliminate
airborne particles. Stines reports that “Our
customers — which are nursing homes, hospitals, other health care
facilities, and schools — are concerned over the outbreak and
uncertain which way to go because of all the different opinions that
have been presented.” In response to what
Stines terms general concern about product availability should the
situation worsen, American Ultraviolet has increased its inventories
to prepare for a maximum-demand scenario. Recognizing that an upswing
in interest today translates to an upswing in web traffic, the
company has also updated its website to provide as much information
as it can find to better educate the consumer. Sanuvox
Technologies ( www.sanuvox.com)
also responded to increased public interest. Sanuvox Technologies
manufactures UV air sterilization systems which are installed into
the ductwork and designed to sterilize the biological contaminants as
they pass through the UV system. Sanuvox also manufactures mobile
decontamination units and standalone HEPA filter / UV air
sterilization systems designed to destroy biocontaminants while
trapping particles down to .3 microns in size. The
manufacuturer has stated that its technology can “destroy the
influenza virus, including those that fall into the family of
Orthomyxoviridae.
These include type A, type B, and type C influenza viruses. The World
Health Organization has confirmed that these cases are a
never-before-seen version of the H1N1 strain of the influenza type A
virus.” Sanuvox’ in-duct system is
designed “to maximize exposure time between the air and the UV
germicidal energy.” The company reports that its portable
standalone UV air sterilization unit has been tested by McGill
University in Montreal, achieving a destruction rate of 90% for
tuberculosis while operating in the Montreal Chest Hospital’s
sputum induction room. Steril-Aire’s
( www.steril-aire.com)
line of high-output UVC Emitters™ is also “designed to destroy
microorganisms including flu and other viruses, bacteria and mold,”
according to the company’s president and chairman, Robert Scheir,
Ph.D. He specifies that these systems are typically installed on the
supply side of the system, downstream from the cooling coil and above
the drain pan. In testing performed by RTI
International on behalf of the EPA and National Homeland Security
Research Center, Steril-Aire’s single-ended UVC Emitters delivered
99% airborne inactivation efficiency on the test virus (MS2
bacteriophage), +99.96% on vegetative form of bacteria, and 96% on
spore form of bacteria. Like the others,
Steril-Aire has seen an increase in related business, “particularly
in the health care and school sectors,” as well as also being
approached as an industry authority for general consumer
information. Scheir also directs readers to
the independent series of EPA reports about the aforementioned
testing, providing some benchmark data for various UVC devices.
Inspect highlights of that study at
www.epa.gov/NHSRC/news/news100406a.html.
Parting Tips
Let’s
conclude with some flu-fighting tips sent along from Trane. Check for
clogged drains and eliminate pooled water. Consider a
higher-efficiency filter, but only if your fan system can handle the
resistance change. Consider timing filter replacements according to
pressure drop, rather than the calendar. Wear cut-resistant gloves
when performing filter or damper maintenance. Check exhaust fans in
restrooms; especially for small fans, dirt can accumulate and reduce
effectiveness.
And remember, it’s not the
BBQ plate that will get you — although it might be person coughing
or sneezing at the next table over. How does takeout sound? ES
|