Efficiency Incentives: Driving toward Enhanced Motor Efficiency
by Mark Jewell
November 1, 2009
|
|
| Figure
1. The MotorMaster
+ software provides an on-screen list that includes the
manufacturer and model, full-load efficiency rating, rpm, and list
price for each motor selected. |
|
Generous incentives and
bonuses keep facility upgrades on the radar in tough times.
The
overwhelming majority of US buildings could benefit from
efficiency-related capital spending — new chillers, boilers,
lighting systems, and/or controls that would ultimately make them
more competitive, profitable, and valuable. Unfortunately, the
economy continues to stymie non-essential capital spending, leaving
many managers wondering how to meet their goals for energy efficiency
and sustainability without the funding required to execute their
plans.
Limiting one’s focus to
“low-/no-cost” measures that are easy to get approved in almost
any economy is certainly one way to deal with capital budgeting
constraints. However, savvy energy managers know that there is a
third category of projects worth considering in times like these —
projects that lie somewhere between the low-/no-cost measures and the
more major upgrades to base building systems. Measures in this third
category are easier to tuck into a tight budget, particularly if
rebates are available to reduce first cost. Upgrades related to motor
efficiency are a superb example of this third category of measures.
Motoring Toward Savings
The
Consortium for Energy Efficiency (CEE) is an excellent source for
managers interested in learning more about the potential for
motor-related savings. For example, the Industrial Programs page of
CEE’s website ( http://www.cee1.org/ind/ind-main.php3)
features the Premium Efficiency Motors Initiative and the Motor
Systems Initiative as well as other resources. As CEE notes in a
recent fact sheet, even small increases in efficiency can yield
noticeable savings in motors run more than 40 hrs/week. And given
that the energy cost for a motor that runs continuously at or near
full load can be 10 to 25 times its purchase price, it’s easy to
see the important role that motors can play in a building’s overall
energy profile. There are many other excellent
online resources to consult on the topic of motor-related savings.
For example, the “CEE Summary of Efficiency Programs for Motors and
Motor Systems” provides an overview of various funding sources
supporting the use of NEMA Premium® motors, adjustable speed drives,
motor management services, system optimization, and other energy
management strategies. Visit
http://www.motorsmatter.org/tools/index.html
for more information.
|
|
| Figure
2. Double clicking to highlight an individual motor
data line in MotorMaster+
yields a formatted display of performance information for
the motor of interest. |
|
The
Industrial Technologies Program of the US Department of Energy’s
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) division offers a
bounty of software tools for identifying and analyzing motor-related
savings opportunities. One of the more notable is MotorMaster+,
several screens of which are featured in Figures 1 through 3. More
information on MotorMaster+
and related initiatives can be found at
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/software.html.
Rebates, More Rebates, and Year-end Bonuses, Too!
As
the above-referenced CEE report suggests, there is a wealth of
motor-related money available these days. Some of these programs are
particularly generous. For example, in Xcel Energy’s Colorado
service territory, replacing an “in-service” (i.e., working) 1-hp
motor with a NEMA Premium® model would qualify for a $200 rebate. If
the replacement were an “Enhanced” NEMA Premium® model, the
rebate would be $210. In that same utility territory, replacing an
in-service 500-hp motor would qualify for rebates of $10,000 and
$13,500 for NEMA Premium and Enhanced NEMA Premium models,
respectively.
Several utilities offer
percentage bonuses if a customer implements three or more
rebate-eligible measures. Installing energy-efficient motors or
drives along with a major lighting and HVAC renovation or efficient
new construction project could trigger these bonus payments. For
example, Austin Energy offers a 25% bonus for new construction that
combines three technologies, while New Jersey’s Clean Energy
program offers a 10% bonus for multiple measures.
Duke
Ohio is another utility offering bonus incentives — in this case,
for any VFD projects completed by December 31, 2009. A VFD applied to
HVAC equipment is eligible to receive a bonus incentive of $25/hp
providing a total incentive of $125/hp, while a VFD applied to
process pumping receives a bonus of $40/hp for a total incentive of
$80/hp.
Focus on Energy (FOE) sometimes offers
bonuses for VFDs. For example, the prescriptive incentive (for both
new construction and retrofit projects) was recently raised from $50
to $75/hp; and, the cap was raised from 30% to 50% for VFDs that were
installed between May 1, 2009 and October 31, 2009. When a bonus
program such as this one expires, the sponsoring utility often
extends it or moves the bonus to stimulate interest in another
program, so it is important to stay tuned for
updates.
Funding sources in New England seem
to have some of the country’s most generous programs for VFDs —
particularly National Grid and NYSERDA. California-based funding
sources are near the top of the list as well.
Finding Cost-effective, Motor-related Projects
|
|
| Figure
3. Once motor characteristics and load point are
entered, MotorMaster+
responds with default motor efficiency and price values
that are representative for the efficiency class (standard,
energy-efficient, or premium efficiency) and for the type
(horsepower, speed, and enclosure) of motor selected. |
|
A
recent multi-year technical assistance program involving over 100
buildings and 40 million sq ft found that more than 75% of the
facilities studied had opportunities to improve the efficiency of
motor-related systems — replacing in-service motors with
right-sized NEMA Premium® efficiency models, adding VFDs, or both.
Moreover, in the case of that particular universe of buildings, the
utility’s already generous incentives were increased by a 30%
rebate bonus, further improving paybacks. The
first two steps toward creating value with motor improvements are
easy: 1) conduct a detailed inventory of a building’s motor-related
energy uses; and, 2) look for rebates or incentives that would make
any recommended upgrades more affordable. And remember, while
elevators and escalators may be the first motor applications that
come to mind, the motors used in HVAC and refrigeration systems alone
can account for 30% or more of a commercial building’s energy use.
As more utilities begin offering incentives
generous enough to motivate the replacement of inefficient in-service
motors, motor-related upgrades will continue to grow in popularity,
even in capital-constrained settings. ES
|